|
|
|
|
- 2 - |
|
|
|
|
|
The freezer is well proven when apart from the incidents
listed under A 10 and A 12. This could have been avoided if the designed
normal packages were present at the location of the stored fresh meat,
isolated with wax packaging, not freezing together as the fresh meat was
frozen into a block. In addition to the damage to the installation caused
by breaking out of the meat there was heavy cooling loss. The room
air cooling system has not yet been put into operation. |
|
|
2. Diving
installation: |
|
|
The boat proceeded
on the outbound and return transit in buoyancy condition B with flooded
main ballast tanks, because the testing and training time showed in the
main, that the boat gets below very badly even in the slightest Sea State
in buoyancy condition A. Failure in the vent actuators has not yet
occurred. It has been found necessary to flood main ballast tank
9 immediately on "Alarm", on "Flood" to open the vents
of the ballast tanks 5/6 and to wait to open ballast tanks 1/2 until the
boat is 3-5 degrees down by the bow. Expressing of the negative
buoyancy tanks not before 14-16 meters, because otherwise the danger exists
that the boat will emerge again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[several illegible sentences here]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To blow with
diesel a blowing pressure of 0.8 - 0.9 atm is used for up to 15 minutes.
(See also b 1 of the Mechanical Supplement) the installation of a blower
(type UD 2 - UD 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 3 - |
|
|
|
|
|
only to blow the ballast tanks and bunkers is suggested
as appropriate. |
|
|
3. Fueling installation: |
|
|
The supplying of boats with
fuel and lubricating oil functioned without difficulties. The sight
glass built-in the delivery line (control room) has been proven.
It would be appropriate to install a drain in the delivery line, specifically
at the outlet fuel oil meter (lowest point), so that after rinsing and
blowing the hose and delivery line the last residual water in the line
can be emptied from the deck. |
|
|
Delivery was made with a
pump outlet pressure of 1.4 - 2.5 atm. At this pressure, said to
be the maximum pressure by the receiving boats, IXC boats achieved an
hourly output of 35 m³ and VIIC boats 30 m³. Of course
the decisive factor is the number of the bunker used on the receiving
boat. Adjustment of the delivery can be effected only by movement of the
pump intake. In the process of adjusting [fuel is] very often completely
cut off and the pump runs dry. According to the shipyard that should
be avoided if possible. It is therefore suggested to make the speed
of the pump adjustable, and set the current normal RPM as the highest
RPM. |
|
|
The oil transfer hose and
gear was damaged in several cases and lost in part. |
|
|
Damaged: 2 hoses 16 meters x 90 mm, 2 hoses 16 meters x 65 mm,
1 hose 8 meters x 90 mm with protective covering, 1 hose 8 meters x 65
mm with protective covering and 1 each stop cock 90 and 65 mm. |
|
|
Lost: 7 hoses 16 meters x 90 mm, 1 hose 8 meters x 90 mm, 5 hoses
16 meters x 65 mm, 2 hoses 8 meters x 90 mm with protective covering,
1 each stop cock 90 and 65 mm, 3 coil end supports 90 mm, external thread
with 45 mm end coupling, 1 end coupling 52/45 mm, 4 closure caps 90 mm,
external thread with compressed air connection, 2 closure caps 90 mm with
internal thread with compressed air connection, 2 compressed air connection
pieces 1/2 inches external and 3/4 inch internal thread and 8 closure
caps for compressed air |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
4 - |
|
|
|
|
|
nozzles
3/4 inch inner thread. |
|
|
The damage or
loss occurred during maneuvers or were due to sea conditions. For
quick repair of damaged hoses, 10 each light metal pipe pieces 90 x 100
and 65 x 300 with strain bandages were deemed necessary. |
|
|
Overview of times, pressures and volumes of fuel oil transfer |
|
|
Date |
Boat
No. |
Boat
type |
Duration
of fueling |
Suction
side |
Pressure
side |
No.
of bunker used |
With
delivery rate |
Output
fuel oil quantity |
Remarks |
|
- |
- |
- |
hours/min |
atm |
atm |
- |
m³/hour |
m³ |
- |
|
20
Apr |
U-108 |
IXC |
0/43 |
-0.24 |
+1.6 |
- |
34.9 |
40 |
|
23
Apr |
U-98 |
VIIC |
1/57 |
+0.10 |
+1.4 |
4 |
27.6 |
40 |
|
23
Apr |
U-333 |
VIIC |
1/37 |
+0.15 |
+2.0 |
6 |
27.8 |
40 |
|
23
Apr |
U-564 |
VIIC |
1/15 |
+0.16 |
+2.5 |
3 |
22.6 |
24 |
|
24
Apr |
U-571 |
VIIC |
0/58 |
+0.10 |
+1.7 |
2 |
28.4 |
25 |
|
24
Apr |
U-582 |
|
2/09 |
+0.09 |
+2.0 |
3 |
28.2 |
55 |
|
|
|
|
0/35 |
-0.05 |
+2.2 |
4 |
32.1 |
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
0/07 |
-0.06 |
+2.2 |
3 |
32.4 |
3.7 |
|
25
Apr |
U-552 |
VIIC |
0/26 |
-0.06 |
+2.2 |
2 |
31.3 |
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
0/04 |
-0.07 |
+2.5 |
1 |
24.4 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
1/12 |
- |
- |
- |
30.1 |
35 |
|
27
Apr |
U-566 |
VIIC |
2/32 |
+0.05 |
+2.0 |
4 |
29.3 |
36 |
55
min. interruption |
|
|
|
0/47 |
+0.08 |
+2.3 |
2 |
20.9 |
17.5 |
29
Apr |
U-572 |
VIIC |
0/30 |
_0.04 |
+2.2 |
3 |
28.5 |
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
0/16 |
-0.05 |
+1.6 |
1 |
18.5 |
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
1/33 |
- |
- |
- |
22.6 |
35 |
|
29
Apr |
U-594 |
VIIC |
1/14 |
+0.08 |
+2.3 |
3 |
26.5 |
25 |
12
min. interruption |
|
|
|
0/40 |
+0.08 |
+2.0 |
5 |
31.9 |
22.5 |
29
Apr |
U-69 |
VIIC |
0/20 |
-0.05 |
+1.5 |
2 |
15.2 |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
0/15 |
-0.07 |
+1.6 |
1 |
14.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
1/15 |
- |
- |
- |
20.4 |
32 |
|
29
Apr |
U-558 |
VIIC |
2/14 |
+0.20 |
+2.5 |
- |
24.1 |
30 |
50
min. interruption hose jammed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
May |
U-754 |
VIIC |
2/25 |
+0.30 |
+3.0 |
6 |
14.4 |
30 |
2
May |
U-103 |
IXC |
2/25 |
+0.30 |
+3.0 |
1 |
13.8 |
30 |
5
May |
U-753 |
VIIC |
1/47 |
+0.20 |
+2.5 |
1 |
10.5 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lubricating oil transfer
worked, apart from the fact that only 5 boats took over lubricating oil. |
|
|
c) |
Experience concerning trim and weight conditions. |
|
The boat could no longer
make its final trim test (U.A.K.) after ballasting in the yard due
to the ice conditions. Only a normal trim test in the
presence U.A.K.was made in 10 meters water depth for the approximate
determination of the weight conditions. |
|
As equipping came on board: 720,700 m³ of fuel oil, 34,300
m³ lubricating oil, 877 potash cartridges, 10,470 m³ of
fresh water, 3350 m³ distillate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
5 - |
|
|
|
|
|
25,700 Kg. provisions and the normal outfitting gear and
consumables minus 323 potash cartridges and 70 oxygen cartridges with
a total weight of 1291-840 = 2132 Kg. |
|
|
Total capacity of both regulating tanks |
55.920 m³ |
Total capacity of both trim tanks |
16.269 m³ |
Contents after the trim test at Helgoland: |
|
Regulating tanks |
46.150 m³ |
Trim tanks |
7.840 m³ |
|
|
|
On 1 April the
starboard negative buoyancy tanks was out of service. With this
the contents decreased to 46.150 - 7.970 - 38,180 m³. The port
negative buoyancy tank continued in service. Sea water density was
between 1.0265 = 1.027 .grams/ml. |
|
|
Total consumption up to 4 May 1942 inclusive: |
Fuel oil: transferred |
477 m³ |
Own consumption |
120 m³ = 597 m³ |
Weight increase of the boat |
101.49 m³ |
|
|
Transfer and consumption (weight relief) |
Provisions |
19.100 |
tons |
|
Lubricating oil |
6.871 |
"
(7,635 m³) |
|
Potash cartridges |
1.492 |
"
(373 units) |
|
Fresh water |
7.120 |
" |
|
distilled water
|
0.700 |
" |
|
Total |
35.285 |
" |
|
|
|
|
Other offset weight: |
|
|
The fuel oil
bunkers: 11-41 were pumped. 20.000 m³. Lubricating
oil whose transfer was not to be expected, pumped via lubricating oil
transfer piping into fuel oil bunker 4a port. 25 m³. |
|
|
Compensating weight: |
|
|
Regulating |
38.180 m³ |
|
Transferred |
35.283 m³ |
|
11-41 |
20.000 m³ |
|
Lubricating oil |
25.000 m³ |
|
Total: |
118.463 m³ |
|
Weight increase |
101.490 m³ |
|
s.Vfg. i regulating tank |
16.973 m³ |
Actual regulating contents |
On 4 May |
13.705 m³ |
|
|
|
|
Still to be
expected delivery and own consumption of fuel oil 20 + 60 m³ = 80
m³. Weight increase 13.6 m³. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
6 - |
|
|
|
|
|
Highest possible
weight relief: |
|
|
Fresh water |
3.000 m³ |
|
Distilled water |
1.400 m³ |
|
Lubricating oil |
1.000 m³ |
|
Provisions transferred |
15000 m³ |
|
Provisions own consumption |
1500 m³ |
|
Potash cartridges
|
1.500 m³ |
(250 units on board) |
|
To Vfg.regulating tank |
9.400 m³ |
+ 0.105 m³ = 9.505 m³ |
|
|
|
The filling
of the regulating tanks to 46.150 m³ is at the correct limit, to
ensure the flooding of the regulating tanks and the compressed air pumping
with the pumping controller. The regulating tank itself is too small for
the purposes of the boat. Apart from the negative buoyancy tanks,
the reserve hose container and torpedo containers in the over deck that
do not always hold tight, the delivery to each boat is different.
Lubricating oil was delivered in 4 cases, delivery to returnees only on
vigorous insistence. Spare parts and consumables in such a small
amount that their weight does not figure. To create manageable weight
conditions, 25 m³ of lubricating oil was pumped via lubricating oil
transfer piping via a hose connection into fuel oil bunker 4a port. This
oil must be discharged and cleaned. Fresh water and distilled water were
reduced to a minimum quantity. It is desirable to enlarge
the regulating space around 10-15 m³ to provide better weight conditions.
It is suggested to remove from the ballast keel the equivalent of the
contents of a negative buoyancy tank and use the negative buoyancy tank
as a spare regulating tank, until the mode of the regulating tank can
be converted. It is also proposed the lubricating oil bunker 5 be
separated by a medium long bulkhead and each half of fuel oil bunker 3
i and 4 be connected. (removal of the transverse bulkhead possible without
laying pipes) these bunkers are pumpable. There would still be 20 m³
lubricating oil on board, an amount that is considered sufficient from
the experience of this patrol. |
|
|
The trim conditions
are sufficient. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|