17 March, 1941 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. As changes occur due to delivery of material or equipment, completion of facilities, or delivery of vessels for duty with the Naval Local Defense Force, inform Commander NOrth Atlantic Naval Coastal Frontier. In the case of vessels reporting for duty with the Naval Local Defense Force, furnish characteristics of these vessels as indicated in paragraph 1 above. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Submit Naval Local Defense Force Operating Plans, (Rainbow) to Commander, North Atlantic Naval Coastal Frontier in conformity with instructions in WPL-44, paragraph 0306 b. In addition, please furnish a copy of the District Operating Plans of the Services (Rainbow O-6, O-7 and O-8) for the Third Naval District library. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADOLPHUS ANDREWS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copy to: CNO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 10, 1941 |
||||||||||||||
Serial 52. | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
1. With a view to furthering close defense coordination between the two Services, it is suggested that a Joint Control and Information Center be established. | ||||||||||||||
2. Survey of possible locations for such a Center indicates that the western area of the 14th floor, Federal Office Building, 90 Church Street, New York City, is the most suitable. With the removal of non-military activities from the building in question, sufficient space in the area mentioned will become available. It is hoped that availability may be accomplished by 1 September. | ||||||||||||||
3. The area suggested combines adequate space, centrally located, with close proximity to present Naval Communication installations, as well as convenient accessibility to various types of land communication channels. | ||||||||||||||
4. It is proposed that at the suggested Joint Control and Information Center, there be present, when desirable, Army liaison officers, who together with representatives of the Navy, could work closely on defense problems. This close contact, it is believed, would be of value in expediting action connected with questions relating to Sub-Sector and Sector defense, as well as decisions in maters pertaining to the Northeast Command and Naval Coastal Frontier. | ||||||||||||||
5. To illustrate the operation of the proposed Information and Control Center in a particular situation, the following case is presented. | ||||||||||||||
A radio position report is received through Naval Communications of an enemy aircraft carrier off the coast. Quick decision and action is essential. With liaison officers present from the Army First Air Force, a bomber attack can be initiated and coordinated with both Naval Coastal Frontier Aviation and such Atlantic Fleet Aviation as may be within striking distance. At the same time, the Army Air Defense Information Center can be informed of the situation, and of the action taken, so that the Army Air Interceptor Command can prepare to meet the threat of enemy land bombing attack. | ||||||||||||||
6. If the above proposal, in brief outline, is agreeable, it is felt that details in execution can be readily adjusted between the two Services. This Command will be happy to cooperate in every possible way to obtain close coordination in joint effort. | ||||||||||||||
copy to: Chief of Naval Operations. | ||||||||||||||
ADOLPHUS ANDREWS | ||||||||||||||
December 22, 1941 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Under WPL-46 the North Atlantic Naval Coastal Frontier was to be considered in Category "B". Certain units were assigned as Coastal Forces to defend the Frontier under this category. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. In accordance with orders, this Coastal Force has been materially depleted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. The North Atlantic Naval Coastal Frontier has since been placed in Category "C". Various warnings have been issued as to probable imminent action by enemy submarines. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. A summary of forces capable of taking limited action against enemy submarines within even a short distance offshore shows the following vessels are at this time available in an emergency, but only by denuding the Local Defense Forces: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1 - |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5. An examination of the foregoing list shows vessels varying in speed from 9 knots to a possible 15 knots for the Eagle boats and the DIONE of 16 1/2 knots. The Coast Guard Cutters are the best fitted for anti-submarine work, but are small and are mostly fully occupied in their regular Coast Guard duties. There is not a vessel available that an enemy submarine could not outdistance when operating on the surface. In most cases the guns of these vessels would be outranged by those of the submarine. The limited capabilities of these vessels are apparent. | ||||||||||
6. Considering the foregoing and the long coastline, it is submitted that should enemy submarines operate off this coast, this Command has no forces available to take adequate action against them, either offensive or defensive. | ||||||||||
7. Transmission of this document via Registered Mail is authorized within the continental limits of the United States. | ||||||||||
ADOLPHUS ANDREWS | ||||||||||
Copy to: Commander-in-Chief, U. S. Atlantic Fleet. | ||||||||||
- 2 - |
||||||||||